[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RDF considered optional (fwd)

To: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@Bristol.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: RDF considered optional (fwd)
From: Janne Saarela <jsaarela@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 11:59:57 +0100
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
References: <Pine.GHP.4.02A.9903172311130.6780-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jsaarela@w3.org
Sender: Janne.Saarela@sophia.inria.fr

Hi Dan

> FYI some comments on SiRPAC alleged bug from XML-DEV

.. thanks for the pointer. Looks more like a design choice I made.
Now, if I, for example, fed an HTML document to SiRPAC, it should
treat it right from the beginning as RDF using the typedNode production -
I don't think so. I do need some start point which indicates RDF is
about to start.

BTW, have you had time to play with the Tellable thing? I think
I place a new version soon available under CVS which will enable
other developers to further develop SiRPAC.

Janne
--
Janne Saarela           | Visiting scientist
Email: jsaarela@w3.org  | World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/

Prev by Date: Re: sirpac
Next by Date: Re: suggestions
Prev by thread: Re: sirpac
Next by thread: SiRPAC V1.11
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread