[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SiRPAC and parseType="Literal" -- bug report?
Good Morning Dan,
> I've just started to use parseType="Literal" in a real application and
> find I can't get any 'literal' triples for those bits of markup where
> I've used rdf:parseType. Am I doing something wrong? I get loads of
> triples for the rest and as far as I can see am following the spec...
Thanks for a good example... indeed SiRPAC changed behaviour since last
release. I now see a change to management of parseType="Resource"
had an influence to my working implementation of parseType="Literal".
I'll fix this today and make a new bug fix release. I think I won't
have the time to incorporate the Literal vs. Node distinction yet, though.
Janne
--
Janne Saarela | Visiting scientist
Email: jsaarela@w3.org | World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/