A Property is the combination of a Resource, a
> PropertyType, and a value. An example would be: "The Author of
209c204
< value can just be a string, for example "Tim Bray" in the previous
---
> Value can just be a string, for example "Tim Bray" in the previous
219c214
< <rdf:Description about='http://www.textuality.com/RDF/Why-RDF.html'>
---
> <RDF:Description href='http://www.textuality.com/RDF/Why-RDF.html'>
221c216
< <Home-Page rdf:resource='http://www.textuality.com' />
---
> <Home-Page RDF:href='http://www.textuality.com' />
232c227
< Since a Property is a resource, any independent
---
> Since a PropertyType is a resource, any independent
242c237
< Since RDF Statements can be converted into XML, they are easy
---
> Since RDF Properties can be converted into XML, they are easy
248,249c243,244
< RDF statements are simple three-part records (Resource,
< Property, value), so they are easy to handle and look things up
---
> RDF properties are simple three-part records (Resource,
> PropertyType, Value), so they are easy to handle and look things up
255c250
< Properties are Resources
---
> PropertyTypes are Resources
261c256
< defined a Property that describes the genre of a movie, with
---
> defined a PropertyType that describes the genre of a movie, with
272c267
< Statements Can Be Resources
---
> Properties Can Be Resources
278c273
< Yahoo!). This means that we'll want, given any Statement such as
---
> Yahoo!). This means that we'll want, given any Property such as
281c276
< Statements will need to have Properties.
---
> Properties will need to have Properties.
291,292c286,287
< corresponds naturally to the distinction between Properties and
< Statements. So it seems as though XML documents should be a natural
---
> corresponds naturally to the distinction between PropertyTypes and
> Properties. So it seems as though XML documents should be a natural
333c328
< Statements into Resources is quite tricky. Also, it turns out that
---
> Properties into Resources is quite tricky. Also, it turns out that
346c341
< doesn't provide though, is any Properties of its own.
---
> doesn't provide though, is any PropertyTypes of its own.
351c346
< It seems unlikely that one Property standing by itself is
---
>
It seems unlikely that one PropertyType standing by itself is
353c348
< packages; for example, a set of basic bibliographic Properties
---
> packages; for example, a set of basic bibliographic PropertyTypes
357c352
< Property vocabularies describing books, videos, pizza joints,
---
> PropertyType vocabularies describing books, videos, pizza joints,
392,413d386
<
<
<
<
< Notes on 31 Dec, 2000 update (Dan Brickley)
<
< The update of Dec 31st, 2000 serves only to bring this document up to
< date with recent RDF terminology. Since this document was first published,
< W3C have published the Model and Syntax
< specification as a Recommendation.
<
<
< I have updated the markup example to use current RDF 1.0 syntax. There
< have also been some terminology changes: 'PropertyType' became 'Property',
< 'Property' became 'Statement'.
< I have also added a brief mention of subject/predicate/object terminology,
< and lowercased a few mentions 'Value' (since rdf:object replaced
< rdf:value for talking about the object of a statement). See the diff for details.
<
<